Posts tagged available
Boulder citizens, youth give high marks to city in survey
Jan 5th
2011 Community Survey results available
Results of the 2011 Community Survey that was conducted this fall are now available online and will be presented to City Council at its regularly scheduled meeting at 6 p.m. on Tuesday, Jan. 10, 2012. Copies of the report are also available in the Main Library, 1001 Arapahoe Ave.
In September and October, surveys were mailed to more than 3,000 households and more than 400 University of Colorado students living in on-campus dormitories. Surveys could also be completed online and were available in Spanish. A total of 971 surveys were returned, which resulted in a 33 percent response rate. That is considered a good rate of return.
The survey asked people about their priorities for the city, quality of life, and their overall satisfaction with government services. Survey responses indicated:
- Perceptions of the quality of life, quality of neighborhoods and the sense of community in Boulder remain high;
- Employment and business related ratings were also high, with 77 percent of respondents rating Boulder as “very good’ or “good” as a place to work, and 69 percent rating Boulder as “very good” or “good” as a place to do business; and,
- Respondents’ priorities for City Council included energy, housing and business development.
The survey results also provided information about public participation and how people would like to obtain information about meetings, issues and programs:
- Approximately 25 percent of respondents said that they had attended a public meeting about city matters in the last year, and about 25 percent had watched a City Council meeting on the city’s municipal Channel 8.
- The Camera (72%), direct mailings (65%), and the city’s website (55%) – www.bouldercolorado.gov – were the most common sources of public information from the city.
The 2011 survey included additional outreach to Spanish speakers through community organizations, and 43 completed surveys were received. Priorities and concerns for these respondents included safety, affordable shopping, housing, adult education opportunities and activities for youth.
A slightly revised survey was also distributed to Boulder youth to help the city determine their concerns and needs. A total of 234 returned surveys indicated that youth priorities include homelessness, improving activities for young people, jobs, discrimination, bike safety and facilities, and the environment.
Survey results will be used to inform the budget process, plan for future projects, develop community outreach and various other ways to help make Boulder a better place to live and work. A complete list of results, responses and methodologies is available at www.BoulderColorado.gov > Hot Topics > 2011 Community Survey Results.
The survey was conducted by Boulder-based National Research Center Inc. Results were weighted and the margin of error is plus or minus three percentage points from the information that would have been obtained if all Boulder adults were surveyed.
Boulder County childcare for needy gets a boost
Dec 27th
Help with childcare available for qualified Boulder County families
Funds from Ballot Initiative 1A continue to boost childcare program and promote self-sufficiency
Boulder County, Colo. – Boulder County Families who need help with childcare and who meet eligibility requirements are once again being invited to sign up for childcare assistance. The Colorado Childcare Assistance Program (CCAP) waitlist is open for applications. CCAP is a program that supports individuals and families at or below 185 percent of the federal poverty level, helping them access quality childcare so the parents or guardians can remain employed or in educational programs. For low-wage working parents and guardians, or parents enrolled in school or technical training, childcare can represent an extraordinary expense.
As economic conditions have worsened, the need for childcare assistance has increased dramatically in Boulder County. Not only are more families in need of this help, but also declining wages and job losses have made more families eligible for CCAP benefits. In 2010, the Boulder County Department of Housing and Human Services suspended enrollment for CCAP because need was outpacing resources for the program. Later that year, Boulder County voters approved Ballot Initiative 1A, which was designed to help backfill deficiencies in state funding for county human services programs. Among other things, money from 1A, also known as the Temporary Safety Net, has been used to reopen the CCAP waitlist and to expand the program itself. More than 40 percent of the $5.1 million raised by 1A in 2011 is being used to meet additional childcare needs in Boulder County.
In order to qualify for CCAP, parents or guardians must be Boulder County residents, and must have a job, be searching for a job, or be in school or seeking training. Income caps for qualification are based on family size. As examples, a family of three with a monthly gross income of less than $2,857 or a family of four with a monthly gross income of less than $3,346 could take part in CCAP. Families who qualify pay a portion of the childcare costs based on income. A full list of requirements and more information on CCAP is available on the Boulder County website or by calling community partner Aspen Family Services (which administers CCAP’s application process) at 303-604-1043, ext. 2828.
Boulder County cropland policy gets a “C” for compromise
Dec 20th
Commissioners adopt Boulder County Cropland Policy
Boulder County, Colo. – The Boulder County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously today to adopt the county Cropland Policy with some additional recommendations.
The policy, which has been under development throughout the last two years, includes the conditional approval of some genetically engineered crops. The approval includes corn, which has been allowed since 2003, and directs staff to develop protocols for the planting of sugar beets.
The additional recommendations will ensure that Roundup Ready crops are not planted year-after-year and maintain crop rotation to prevent herbicide-resistant weeds from developing on public lands. Additionally, a notification program will be established to inform Boulder County land managers and neighboring private farms and landowners when any new genetically engineered crop is to be planted on public land.
Statement from Commissioners Ben Pearlman, Cindy Domenico and Will Toor:
First and foremost we would like to thank the thousands of people who have been involved in the process of crafting this policy. From the staff and advisory group members who poured months of research into the process, to the input and comments we received from all segments of the community, we are most appreciative of this massive collective effort. Working on this policy has been one of the biggest challenges each of us has faced as elected officials, and also one of the most educational and worthwhile processes we have undertaken. It is important to note that 83 of the 86 recommendations included in the policy are universally accepted.
The Cropland Policy deals with agricultural land publicly owned by Boulder County. In other words, this policy affects only about 10 percent of the farms located in Boulder County and about 15 percent of the county’s cropland. We know that we must continue working with all public land farmers – conventional and organic – to farm this agricultural land, and farm it well, to increase local food production, prevent takeover by noxious weeds, and use best practices to preserve the land for future generations.
We have already implemented policies to promote agriculture on our public lands, including the application of lease revenues back into farming, supporting better infrastructure like improved water delivery systems and crop storage, and helping small-market and organic farmers get onto the land and become productive. We have also taken specific measures to increase organic farming on public land. This includes rent reduction for those transitioning to organic and funding the expansion of the Longmont farmers market.
We have worked steadily to train new farmers, particularly those interested in organic farms, and county open space land under organic production or transition has increased dramatically – from less than 150 acres in 2005 to more than 1,500 acres in 2012. That is 10 percent of our public cropland, or about 15 times the national average of .7 percent. However, even as we push toward increased organic, a large percentage of our land will be in conventional production for years to come
The Cropland Policy we have adopted provides more detail on how we will manage these resources in a balanced way into the future. In crafting this policy, we’ve heard loud and clear from the public that people want local food produced by local farmers that is healthy, grown with less pesticide, and that provides as much value as possible out of each crop. This leads us to highlight our need to diversify, to support a great variety of farms, crops and farmers. With 30 percent of Boulder County residents living at just 200 percent of the national poverty rate, we need make our local food system work for everyone in the most cost-effective way possible.
Following a thorough review process and meeting strict protocols, genetically modified field corn was approved as a crop on Open Space lands in 2003. Pollen drift studies for five years confirmed that the protocols were effective. No issues have been raised over that time by organic producers. 
Now, as tenant farmers have applied to plant genetically engineered sugar beets, we have looked even further into the issue. What we have seen locally as farmers have moved to genetically engineered corn and sugar beets are reductions in the toxicity and amount of pesticide and herbicide used, as well as reductions in erosion and runoff as farmers have been able to turn to strip tilling and low tilling practices. We have also seen significant increases in yield coupled with a decreasing carbon footprint resulting from fewer passes across the field to deliver pesticides and herbicides.
Farming is a struggle, as we have heard from each farmer we have visited. We cannot take tools away without replacing them with real options. We need to move forward, acknowledging agriculture’s complexity and celebrating its diversity. We know that Boulder County farmers have always used crop rotation as a best practice and that rotation will continue to benefit croplands by stifling the emergence herbicide-resistant weeds.
However, genetically modified crops come with downsides, and many people have expressed concerns about the crops’ food safety risks and impacts on human health. While additional study is necessary, science indicates that the health impact on humans is not likely to be significant and the risks associated with genetically modified foods are not likely to be higher than those associated with a variety of types of conventional breeding. With that in mind, we still believe that consumer choice is important and that people should have the ability to choose not to eat them. To that end, we strongly support labeling and will include this in the county’s federal legislative agenda.
We believe an outright ban of genetically engineered crops on our land is not the right direction to take. With appropriate safeguards, they can be a part of the overall mix of uses on cropland. Moreover, appropriate protocols for planting and managing these crops are absolutely necessary, including evaluating any future crops that become available based on their individual characteristics. In particular, we do not support the use of any additional glyphosate tolerant crops that would be in rotation with corn or sugar beets, as we do not support the use of Roundup on the same lands year after year.
We have always been about co-existence in Boulder County. Large and small farms sit side-by-side. Organic farmers and conventional farmers, on private and public land, work just over the fence line with respect for one another, neighbors working together. Farmers in Boulder County must pursue a variety of options in order to remain viable and if we want local food sources, we must allow local producers to grow crops that are profitable.
Most importantly, we believe that the changes we want to see on our cropland – the meaningful efforts to produce locally grown food for Boulder County markets– will occur as a result of our continued cooperation with local farmers. One thing that has been clear in this process is that a broad cross section of the community supports the goal of increasing local food production for local consumption. The county is committed to working with the farmers, with the local natural foods industry, and with other stakeholders to expand the local food system.
Again, we want to say how much we appreciate the large number of residents and members of the farming community who contributed to the lively and informational debate that influenced and guided our decisions.
-BoulderCounty.org-
