Crime
We moved Boulder Crime News and police blotter out of News and made it a primary category. Even though crime news is the highest in analytic s some readers complain because it ruins non violent news. Our readers and viewers prefer science, tech environmental and entertainment news. So crime news junkies now have your own bad news section here.
Three Boulder Journalists on SUPRESSION of news by Boulder Police and Council
May 2nd
Boulder Colorado May 2, 2026 Boulder Channel 1 News Feature These are excerpts from 4 boulder journalists who cover crime. They have been hog tied by Boulder Police department and Boulder city council.
Steve Lynton is a retired News Reporter who write about city news on Nextdoor He has covered crime and war and city beats for over 30 years. He is a seasoned news reporter Yup, Todd is not only “Boulder’s independent crime journalist”–he is, in fact, the only person in Boulder who provides regular reporting on criminal incidents in this city, perhaps the most fundamental requirement of news coverage in a municipality. That’s because Boulder is a news desert.
The Daily Camera only reports what BPD’s PR reps choose to post in their occasional news releases. Once in a while, the Camera also publishes details from a police statement that’s eventually been entered into jail or court records as a result of a criminal proceeding. Broadcast media also only report BPD’s news releases.
As for Boulder Reporting Lab, it’s not a news organization; it’s a “progressive” advocacy organization and, therefore, does not cover crime or criminal justice proceedings. Stacy Feldman, who runs BPR, considers criminal activity to constitute “negative” news, unworthy of mention on her advocacy website. In contrast, Todd does the basic reporting that the media ought to be doing. He obtains incident reports as soon as they become available and reports what he finds on Nextdoor.
Todd also visits the scenes of some criminal incidents and attaches photos of what he observes. He used to report on incidents from scanner traffic. But Redfearn has cracked down on public information and shut off access to scanner traffic. Redfearn also has instituted a system designed to delay and obstruct the release of incident reports and other public information.
This is a city marked by illegal encampments, drug trafficking, overdose deaths, assaults and other criminal incidents, many of them stemming from addiction and mental illness. Downtown shops and restaurants face vandalism and shoplifting. Still, only Todd can be counted on to report news of these recurring incidents. We can observe the mess left by those encampments. But only Todd reports the details of the criminal incidents linked to the encampments and occurring in other neighborhoods.
Todd Root writes Boulder Police Scanner reports. He has been denied access by Boulder police Department, thanks for your comment. I weigh what information to share very carefully for various reasons, including possible harm to those involved. Sometimes I cut stories altogether because it’s just too risky, particularly for the victim(s).
I am happy to answer questions about my thought processes in this regard. The police department doesn’t release reports related to incidents which are still under investigation. However, in some cases, releasing light details – such as that a robbery occurred and police were responding – can convey what happened without compromising anything sensitive. Absent that, we often see broad guesses and speculation from the public, which is also problematic.
I do pull arrest affidavits, as you describe, but I prefer the final police reports because they contains more information, particularly info added after the initial arrest. It is unfortunate that it can take a lot longer. And of course arrest affidavits are only available in cases where someone was arrested.
You are correct that most crimes pose no threat to the public. However, that’s not the only reason to share information about them. There’s also conveying a picture of what the police deal with, since there are people who hate the police based solely on their ideology. And often, public sympathy is the only justice the victim ever sees.
You can view all my past reporting, which I am slowly compiling, here. Let me know if you see information included which you feel is possibly harmful: https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vRiz7uN7tH7qTCRaiA0TH2keaSjv1S_jbOubCjX5FwHNhTR1TRKIFuup88TWye2PpohnHs20oGKOt9R/pub If you don’t like reading this content, reading it is, of course, optional. If you’re opposed to my doing this work at all, go talk to the Boulder Progressives. This was their idea. They wanted to learn all about this city’s criminal underbelly from me and have never reconsidered that.
Rob Smoke has been a writer for The Daily Camera He writes about Boulder police chief.
When they did the “public interview” process at council chambers with the 3 “finalists”, his presentation was absolutely horrible — every word out of his mouth was a piece of stale cheese — seriously…every single sentence and phrase was something he rehearsed in the shower a very long time ago.
Precisely zero interesting stories about his career or life or anything. I challenge anyone to watch the video and tell me different…outside of a few corrupt council members who undoubtedly knew the outcome before the interview.
He also wouldn’t account for his behavior regarding the police arrest and killing of a young person of color in Aurora, Elijah McClain (in 2019), where he generated a report containing blatantly false information about the suspect’s behavior.
The results highlight the workings of the standard political “buddy system”. If Mark Wallach or Matt Benjamin need a favor from the police, there’s always a guy ready to assist. This circumstance came up over the summer where a young activist drawing with chalk on a sidewalk (it washes off in the rain, people), somehow got arrested for it and in another incident was charged with assault for having a heated conversation with Matt Benjamin and his wife at the Farmer’s Market.
If there’s one thing that’s true about any of this, it’s likely that… regardless of prior standards, we all need to lower our expectations when interacting with City of Boulder police officers. The whole “leading by example” thing is out the window.
Boulder D.A and Colorado Attorney General could arrest Donald Trumps, Jail him w/o bail and Try him for crimes against Humanity
Jan 1st
However, hypothetically, it could be possible if new circumstances arose that met strict legal thresholds. Here’s a high-level overview of how Colorado’s system works, based on the state constitution (Article II, Section 19, as amended) and statutes like CRS 16-4-101 et seq.:
1. Establish Probable Cause for Arrest
Law enforcement (e.g., local police, sheriff’s deputies, or state troopers) must have probable cause to believe a crime was committed and that Trump committed it. This could stem from evidence like witness statements, documents, or investigations.
Arrest could occur with a warrant (issued by a judge after reviewing an affidavit) or warrantless if it’s a felony observed in progress or exigent circumstances exist (CRS 16-3-102).
Without probable cause, any arrest would be unlawful and subject to challenge (e.g., via habeas corpus or suppression motions).
2. Charge with a Qualifying Offense Crimes against Humanity
The district attorney (DA) in the relevant Colorado county (e.g., Denver DA if the alleged crime occurred there) would file charges via complaint or indictment by a grand jury.
For bail to be deniable, the charge must fall under exceptions in the Colorado Constitution (Article II, Section 19):
Capital offenses (though Colorado abolished the death penalty in 2020, this still applies to severe crimes like first-degree murder where “proof is evident or presumption great”).
First-degree murder (per 2024’s Amendment I, which removed the automatic right to bail for such cases if proof is evident).
Crimes of violence (e.g., murder, felony sexual assault, class 1 felonies) where the court finds:
Proof evident or presumption great.
Public safety risk if released.
Likelihood of non-appearance.
Non-qualifying offenses (e.g., misdemeanors or lower felonies) generally entitle the accused to bail.
3. Hold a Bail Hearing and Deny Bail
After arrest, the accused must appear before a judge within 48-96 hours for an initial advisement and bail setting (CRS 16-4-102).
The DA can request bail denial at a hearing, presenting evidence to meet the constitutional thresholds (e.g., clear proof of guilt and danger).
If the judge agrees, bail is denied, and the person remains jailed pretrial. The trial must start within 90 days if bail is denied (to avoid indefinite detention).
Factors considered: Severity of the crime, criminal history, flight risk, and community ties. Appeals are possible to higher courts.
4. Additional Legal Considerations
As a former (and potentially sitting) president, federal protections like Secret Service details and DOJ policies against indicting a sitting president could complicate state actions, though states have independent authority over local crimes.
Any process must comply with due process under the U.S. Constitution (5th and 14th Amendments) to avoid dismissal or civil rights lawsuits.
If charges involve federal matters (e.g., election-related), they might be removed to federal court.
In summary, it’s only possible if Trump were charged with a bail-deniable offense in Colorado supported by strong evidence, following due process. Without that, it’s not legal or feasible. For real-time developments, consult official sources like the Colorado Judicial Branch or a licensed attorney.
As 2025 Comes to a Close: Lingering Questions and Distrust in the Death of CU Boulder Student Megan Trussell
Dec 29th

A major source of ongoing distrust has been the handling of media requests by the Boulder County Sheriff’s Office and the Coroner’s Office.
Boulder Channel 1 reporters faced repeated difficulties in securing information: detectives refused to speak directly with our team or provide interviews, and Public Information Officer Vinnie Montez was often uncooperative when questions were posed about the investigation’s progress, evidence details, or alternative theories. Similarly, the Coroner’s Office provided limited responses and did not engage substantively with reporters seeking clarification on timelines, testing delays, or forensic decisions.




















