Posts tagged managing
Deepwater Horizon lessons are subject of Jan. 26 lecture at CU-Boulder
Jan 17th
The University of Colorado Boulder will host a free public lecture this month illuminating the lessons learned from the April 2010 Deepwater Horizon explosion that killed 11 workers and resulted in the largest accidental oil spill in U.S. history.
Called “What Happened at Deepwater Horizon?” the event will be presented Jan. 26 from 6:30 to 9 p.m. in the Mathematics Building auditorium, room 100.
Donald Winter, former secretary of the Navy, professor of engineering practice at the University of Michigan and chair of the National Academies committee that wrote a report on the Deepwater Horizon accident, will be the first of two guest speakers.
The report, issued last month, points to multiple flawed decisions leading to the blowout and explosion, and calls for a new “system safety” approach to anticipating and managing possible dangers at every level of operation.
A second guest speaker will be Paul Hsieh, a research hydrologist with the U.S. Geological Survey who was named 2011 Federal Employee of the Year. Hsieh performed the crucial calculations on pressure that deemed it safe to cap the oil well in mid-July without causing it to rupture from beneath the seabed and result in a bigger disaster.
Two CU-Boulder environmental engineering faculty who have been researching the aftermath of the incident also will present their findings at the event. Fernando Rosario-Ortiz will discuss the environmental fate of dispersants used in the disaster response and Alina Handorean will present information on air quality impacts of the oil spill.
“I was really jarred by this event because it was so preventable,” said event co-organizer Jana Milford, professor and director of the Environmental Engineering Program at CU-Boulder. “By learning more about what happened, I think we can encourage a stronger culture around safety.”
The event is presented by the College of Engineering and Applied Science, the BOLD Center, the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Environmental Engineering Program.
For more information or to request accommodations for disabilities call 303-492-4774.
City giving incentive rebates to high-tech company
Jan 5th
City Manager approves business incentive for Tendril
City Manager Jane S. Brautigam has approved a flexible rebate application for Boulder-based Tendril for up to $85,000 in rebates. The rebates were authorized for sales and use taxes, and permit-related fees.
The flexible rebate program is one of the city’s business incentives, covering a wide range of fees, equipment and construction use taxes. Under this program, the city manager may consider a specific incentive package for tax and fee rebates to meet a company’s specific needs. The company is then eligible for the rebate after it has made its investment and paid the taxes or fees to the city.
“The City of Boulder is pleased that Tendril, a company founded in Boulder, is growing and able to maintain operations in the city, in part, due to city-offered incentives,” said City Manager Jane S. Brautigam. “Tendril is at the forefront of energy technology and represents the future of the industry.”
Tendril is transforming the way the world interacts with energy. The company’s technology allows consumers to modify their behaviors to reduce both their costs and energy usage and allows the utility to speak with the consumer during peak periods in order to reduce demand. Tendril is expanding and recently renovated and moved into an approximately 52,000 square-foot space at 2560 55th St.
“We are proud to be a Boulder-based company. Boulder provides access to great talent, an unmatched quality of life for our employees and a vibrant technology community that is quickly becoming a center of clean tech innovation,” said David Rayner, chief financial officer at Tendril. “As a leader in clean technology, it is important to us that we ‘walk the walk’ on green initiatives and we’re thrilled to receive recognition from the City of Boulder for our sustainability efforts.”
The flexible rebate program uses social, community, and environmental sustainability guidelines. Companies choose the guidelines that best fit their circumstances, but must meet minimum requirements in order to receive the rebate. Tendril has exceeded the minimum community sustainability guidelines. Of note, Tendril participates in RTD’s Eco Pass program and has a Green Team responsible for managing environmental initiatives, including holding in-house educational sessions, purchasing energy-friendly appliances, and maintaining composting and recycling programs. The company will participate in energy efficiency programs such as receiving an energy assessment for its new facility and participating in the 10 for Change challenge.
Tendril’s flexible rebate application is one of six submitted to the city in late 2011. Five 2011 applications are pending. The city’s approved 2012 budget includes $350,000 in funding for 2012 flexible tax and fee rebates for primary employers.
Boulder County cropland policy gets a “C” for compromise
Dec 20th
Commissioners adopt Boulder County Cropland Policy
Boulder County, Colo. – The Boulder County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously today to adopt the county Cropland Policy with some additional recommendations.
The policy, which has been under development throughout the last two years, includes the conditional approval of some genetically engineered crops. The approval includes corn, which has been allowed since 2003, and directs staff to develop protocols for the planting of sugar beets.
The additional recommendations will ensure that Roundup Ready crops are not planted year-after-year and maintain crop rotation to prevent herbicide-resistant weeds from developing on public lands. Additionally, a notification program will be established to inform Boulder County land managers and neighboring private farms and landowners when any new genetically engineered crop is to be planted on public land.
Statement from Commissioners Ben Pearlman, Cindy Domenico and Will Toor:
First and foremost we would like to thank the thousands of people who have been involved in the process of crafting this policy. From the staff and advisory group members who poured months of research into the process, to the input and comments we received from all segments of the community, we are most appreciative of this massive collective effort. Working on this policy has been one of the biggest challenges each of us has faced as elected officials, and also one of the most educational and worthwhile processes we have undertaken. It is important to note that 83 of the 86 recommendations included in the policy are universally accepted.
The Cropland Policy deals with agricultural land publicly owned by Boulder County. In other words, this policy affects only about 10 percent of the farms located in Boulder County and about 15 percent of the county’s cropland. We know that we must continue working with all public land farmers – conventional and organic – to farm this agricultural land, and farm it well, to increase local food production, prevent takeover by noxious weeds, and use best practices to preserve the land for future generations.
We have already implemented policies to promote agriculture on our public lands, including the application of lease revenues back into farming, supporting better infrastructure like improved water delivery systems and crop storage, and helping small-market and organic farmers get onto the land and become productive. We have also taken specific measures to increase organic farming on public land. This includes rent reduction for those transitioning to organic and funding the expansion of the Longmont farmers market.
We have worked steadily to train new farmers, particularly those interested in organic farms, and county open space land under organic production or transition has increased dramatically – from less than 150 acres in 2005 to more than 1,500 acres in 2012. That is 10 percent of our public cropland, or about 15 times the national average of .7 percent. However, even as we push toward increased organic, a large percentage of our land will be in conventional production for years to come
The Cropland Policy we have adopted provides more detail on how we will manage these resources in a balanced way into the future. In crafting this policy, we’ve heard loud and clear from the public that people want local food produced by local farmers that is healthy, grown with less pesticide, and that provides as much value as possible out of each crop. This leads us to highlight our need to diversify, to support a great variety of farms, crops and farmers. With 30 percent of Boulder County residents living at just 200 percent of the national poverty rate, we need make our local food system work for everyone in the most cost-effective way possible.
Following a thorough review process and meeting strict protocols, genetically modified field corn was approved as a crop on Open Space lands in 2003. Pollen drift studies for five years confirmed that the protocols were effective. No issues have been raised over that time by organic producers. 
Now, as tenant farmers have applied to plant genetically engineered sugar beets, we have looked even further into the issue. What we have seen locally as farmers have moved to genetically engineered corn and sugar beets are reductions in the toxicity and amount of pesticide and herbicide used, as well as reductions in erosion and runoff as farmers have been able to turn to strip tilling and low tilling practices. We have also seen significant increases in yield coupled with a decreasing carbon footprint resulting from fewer passes across the field to deliver pesticides and herbicides.
Farming is a struggle, as we have heard from each farmer we have visited. We cannot take tools away without replacing them with real options. We need to move forward, acknowledging agriculture’s complexity and celebrating its diversity. We know that Boulder County farmers have always used crop rotation as a best practice and that rotation will continue to benefit croplands by stifling the emergence herbicide-resistant weeds.
However, genetically modified crops come with downsides, and many people have expressed concerns about the crops’ food safety risks and impacts on human health. While additional study is necessary, science indicates that the health impact on humans is not likely to be significant and the risks associated with genetically modified foods are not likely to be higher than those associated with a variety of types of conventional breeding. With that in mind, we still believe that consumer choice is important and that people should have the ability to choose not to eat them. To that end, we strongly support labeling and will include this in the county’s federal legislative agenda.
We believe an outright ban of genetically engineered crops on our land is not the right direction to take. With appropriate safeguards, they can be a part of the overall mix of uses on cropland. Moreover, appropriate protocols for planting and managing these crops are absolutely necessary, including evaluating any future crops that become available based on their individual characteristics. In particular, we do not support the use of any additional glyphosate tolerant crops that would be in rotation with corn or sugar beets, as we do not support the use of Roundup on the same lands year after year.
We have always been about co-existence in Boulder County. Large and small farms sit side-by-side. Organic farmers and conventional farmers, on private and public land, work just over the fence line with respect for one another, neighbors working together. Farmers in Boulder County must pursue a variety of options in order to remain viable and if we want local food sources, we must allow local producers to grow crops that are profitable.
Most importantly, we believe that the changes we want to see on our cropland – the meaningful efforts to produce locally grown food for Boulder County markets– will occur as a result of our continued cooperation with local farmers. One thing that has been clear in this process is that a broad cross section of the community supports the goal of increasing local food production for local consumption. The county is committed to working with the farmers, with the local natural foods industry, and with other stakeholders to expand the local food system.
Again, we want to say how much we appreciate the large number of residents and members of the farming community who contributed to the lively and informational debate that influenced and guided our decisions.
-BoulderCounty.org-
