City News
This is news from the city of Boulder, about the city or any of its departments
Boulder’s pro-Palestine movement has intensified its criticism of U.S. Rep. Joe Neguse
Mar 13th
Boulder’s pro-Palestine movement has intensified its criticism of U.S. Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.), following a heated email exchange that highlights deep divisions over U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.
Dateline: Boulder, Colorado – March 13, 2026 Local activist Rob Smoke sent a strongly worded email to Congressman Neguse early Friday, accusing him of complicity in violence against Palestinians through U.S. military support for Israel. Smoke referenced Neguse’s alleged presence and applause during Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s addresses to Congress, as well as claims of AIPAC financial influence on the representative. The message described graphic civilian casualties in Gaza, calling Neguse a “shameless pile of excrement” and a “disgrace.”
Smoke copied numerous local figures, including activists, journalists, and community members, sparking a chain of replies. Rob Prince praised the directness, suggesting Neguse was “groomed” for higher office by compromising principles. Joy Barrett expressed understanding of the outrage but cautioned about publicly sharing emails amid risks to free speech and vulnerable community members. Evan Ravitz labeled Neguse “Genocide Joe,” critiquing his role as Assistant Democratic Leader and ties to defense interests. Eve Partridge shared frustrations over politicians’ stances on regional conflicts, including funding for Israel.
Neguse’s office had earlier responded to a constituent message—apparently related to U.S. involvement in Iran—defending his vote for H.Con.Res.38, a war powers resolution to remove U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities in Iran. Records confirm Neguse supported the measure in early March.
The exchange reflects broader tensions in Boulder, a hub for pro-Palestine activism amid ongoing debates over U.S. aid to Israel. Critics point to Neguse’s campaign contributions from pro-Israel groups, including significant AIPAC-related support over recent cycles.
Neguse’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the email or related accusations. The incident underscores persistent local activism challenging congressional positions on Middle East policy as conflicts continue to influence domestic discourse.
Should City Boulder form Metropolitan Districts ?
Mar 6th
Boulder March 6, 2026 by Boulder channel 1 News Should the City of Boulder allow the formation of Metropolitan Districts under a proposed local ordinance?
The City of Boulder is exploring an ordinance (with drafts open for community feedback through March 16, 2026) to permit property owners to propose Metropolitan Districts — limited special entities that finance public infrastructure like roads, water, and sewer lines through property taxes within a defined area. This tool aims to support long-term financial stability by ensuring new growth pays for its own infrastructure, rather than burdening the city’s general fund.
Proponents argue it could accelerate development or redevelopment while aligning with Boulder’s values through strict local standards, a Model Service Plan setting debt limits and tax caps, and maximum legal protections for the city and residents.
Here are the key pros and cons based on the city’s materials, Colorado-wide experiences with metro districts, and development discussions:Pros:
- Enables growth to be self-funding: “Metropolitan Districts help accelerate development or redevelopment opportunities within a specified area by ensuring that growth pays for its own infrastructure,” per city officials. This reduces pressure on the city’s budget for extending services to new areas.
- Supports housing and affordability goals: By spreading infrastructure costs over time via bonds repaid through property taxes, districts can lower upfront home prices (potentially by tens of thousands per home, as seen in broader Colorado examples), helping address housing shortages without immediate taxpayer burdens.
- Provides tailored infrastructure financing: Districts fund essential public improvements (roads, utilities, parks) not covered by city funds, making large-scale or redevelopment projects more feasible while adhering to local standards for alignment with Boulder’s goals.
- Offers city protections: The proposed ordinance and Model Service Plan would impose strict rules on services, debt, and taxation to safeguard residents and the city, building on recent state transparency reforms.
Cons:
- Adds property tax burden on residents: Owners within a district face ongoing special taxes (mill levies) to repay infrastructure debt, which could increase costs for homeowners — especially if development slows or sells out incompletely, as seen in some historical Colorado cases where taxes rose sharply.
- Creates independent entities with limited city control: Metro districts operate separately from the general fund and can incur debt/obligations independently, raising concerns about long-term accountability, even with local oversight.
- Risk of misalignment or abuse without strong regulation: Past issues in Colorado (e.g., high debt burdens in slow-selling developments) highlight potential downsides; while Boulder’s proposal emphasizes protections, critics note metro districts are “powerful” tools that require careful oversight to avoid negative impacts on residents.
- Could incentivize sprawl over infill: Enabling easier financing for new development might shift focus away from denser, in-city projects, conflicting with Boulder’s priorities for sustainable growth and preserving open space.
City Council is tentatively set to review the ordinance on April 2 (first reading) and April 16 (second reading), 2026. Residents can provide feedback on the drafts via the city’s website to help shape this tool for Boulder’s future.
Boulder Older Adult Services Age Well programs in March 2026
Mar 3rd
Boulder channel 1 News: Boulder Colorado, March 3, 2026 The City of Boulder Older Adult Services Age Well Newsletter (March 2, 2026) highlights key updates and spring programs for adults 60+.Important Notes
- East Boulder Community Center and East Age Well Center closed March 14–22 for annual maintenance.
- 2026 registration requires a new SmartRec by Amilia account (details at bouldercolorado.gov/recreation-software).
- Spring 2026 Let’s Age Well Program Guide available online or at Age Well Centers. Registration opens March 3 at 9 a.m.
Fitness and Wellness
- Therapeutic massage (60+, one hour/month) at East/West Centers; spring appointments open March 3.
- Chair Yoga (West: Mondays/Fridays), Feldenkrais (East: Tuesdays), Strength & Alignment (West: Wednesdays).
- Ukemi: The Art of Falling Safely (East: Level I & II Wednesdays).
- Mindfulness Meditation (West: 1st Wednesday, free), Plant Forward: Micronutrient Rainbow (East: March 12, free).
Dance
- Popular Line Dance (West: Tuesdays), American Tango (East: Thursdays).
- 3rd Law Dance/Theater In Motion Project (West: Thursdays, free; for Parkinson’s/mobility needs).
- Tea Dance (East: select Fridays, $5 drop-in). Private lessons available by appointment.
Lifelong Learning
- Memoir Writing (West: Mondays), BMoCA Exhibit Tour (March 3, $5), Shakespeare: The Merchant of Venice (online).
- Pottery classes with Groundworks Art Lab (various dates, low fee or free SPARK session).
- Active Minds: Harriet Tubman (March 11, free), Owls of Boulder County (March 13, free), Iris Folding Art (March 16).
Aging in Place & Support
- Cultivate info table, Aging Solo, Conversations About Death (online & in-person).
- Case manager drop-ins Tuesdays/Thursdays; call 303-441-4388 for appointments.
Other Highlights
- Free AARP Tax-Aide (Tues/Fri at East through April 10; book at cotaxaide.org).
- Monthly Boulder Walks, tech help, Mahjong/Canasta groups, drop-in fitness via Parks & Rec.
For details, visit the Older Adult Services website or contact West (303-441-3148) or East (303-413-7290) Age Well Centers.
