Boulder Channel 1
This user hasn't shared any biographical information
Posts by Boulder Channel 1
Table Mesa King Soopers mass shooting approaches
Mar 15th
Boulder Channel 1 News Boulder, Colorado Sunday, March 15, 2026 Boulder Prepares for Fifth Annual Boulder Strong Day of Remembrance
BOULDER – As the fifth anniversary of the tragic Table Mesa King Soopers mass shooting approaches, the City of Boulder is inviting residents to come together in healing and reflection at the annual Boulder Strong Day of Remembrance on March 22, 2026.
On that fateful day in 2021, the community lost 10 beloved members: Tralona Bartkowiak, Suzanne Fountain, Teri Leiker, Kevin Mahoney, Lynn Murray, Rikki Olds, Neven Stanisic, Denny Stong, Jody Waters, and Boulder Police Officer Eric Talley, who heroically responded to the scene.
The event serves as a dedicated space to honor their lives, support affected families and friends, and acknowledge the enduring resilience of Boulder.
“March 22 will always mark a moment of deep remembrance in Boulder,” said Mayor Aaron Brockett. “It is a day to reflect on those who were taken from us and to stand with the families, friends, and community members whose lives were changed forever. We will continue to acknowledge the lasting impact of that day, honor the legacy of those we lost, and find comfort in our resilience as a community.”
This year’s gathering will take place at the Museum of Boulder, located at 2205 Broadway. Doors open at 3:30 p.m., with the formal program running from 4 to 4:30 p.m. Admission is free and open to the public.
The City of Boulder, partnering with local organizations, emphasizes that healing remains an ongoing journey for many impacted by the shooting. Resources for mental health and trauma support are available through the city’s Boulder Strong webpage.For more details on the Day of Remembrance, visit www.bouldercolorado.gov/boulderstrong.
Boulder Channel 1 News will continue to cover community events and provide updates as the date approaches. In times of remembrance, Boulder stands united.
Boulder’s pro-Palestine movement has intensified its criticism of U.S. Rep. Joe Neguse
Mar 13th
Boulder’s pro-Palestine movement has intensified its criticism of U.S. Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.), following a heated email exchange that highlights deep divisions over U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.
Dateline: Boulder, Colorado – March 13, 2026 Local activist Rob Smoke sent a strongly worded email to Congressman Neguse early Friday, accusing him of complicity in violence against Palestinians through U.S. military support for Israel. Smoke referenced Neguse’s alleged presence and applause during Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s addresses to Congress, as well as claims of AIPAC financial influence on the representative. The message described graphic civilian casualties in Gaza, calling Neguse a “shameless pile of excrement” and a “disgrace.”
Smoke copied numerous local figures, including activists, journalists, and community members, sparking a chain of replies. Rob Prince praised the directness, suggesting Neguse was “groomed” for higher office by compromising principles. Joy Barrett expressed understanding of the outrage but cautioned about publicly sharing emails amid risks to free speech and vulnerable community members. Evan Ravitz labeled Neguse “Genocide Joe,” critiquing his role as Assistant Democratic Leader and ties to defense interests. Eve Partridge shared frustrations over politicians’ stances on regional conflicts, including funding for Israel.
Neguse’s office had earlier responded to a constituent message—apparently related to U.S. involvement in Iran—defending his vote for H.Con.Res.38, a war powers resolution to remove U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities in Iran. Records confirm Neguse supported the measure in early March.
The exchange reflects broader tensions in Boulder, a hub for pro-Palestine activism amid ongoing debates over U.S. aid to Israel. Critics point to Neguse’s campaign contributions from pro-Israel groups, including significant AIPAC-related support over recent cycles.
Neguse’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the email or related accusations. The incident underscores persistent local activism challenging congressional positions on Middle East policy as conflicts continue to influence domestic discourse.
Should City Boulder form Metropolitan Districts ?
Mar 6th
Boulder March 6, 2026 by Boulder channel 1 News Should the City of Boulder allow the formation of Metropolitan Districts under a proposed local ordinance?
The City of Boulder is exploring an ordinance (with drafts open for community feedback through March 16, 2026) to permit property owners to propose Metropolitan Districts — limited special entities that finance public infrastructure like roads, water, and sewer lines through property taxes within a defined area. This tool aims to support long-term financial stability by ensuring new growth pays for its own infrastructure, rather than burdening the city’s general fund.
Proponents argue it could accelerate development or redevelopment while aligning with Boulder’s values through strict local standards, a Model Service Plan setting debt limits and tax caps, and maximum legal protections for the city and residents.
Here are the key pros and cons based on the city’s materials, Colorado-wide experiences with metro districts, and development discussions:Pros:
- Enables growth to be self-funding: “Metropolitan Districts help accelerate development or redevelopment opportunities within a specified area by ensuring that growth pays for its own infrastructure,” per city officials. This reduces pressure on the city’s budget for extending services to new areas.
- Supports housing and affordability goals: By spreading infrastructure costs over time via bonds repaid through property taxes, districts can lower upfront home prices (potentially by tens of thousands per home, as seen in broader Colorado examples), helping address housing shortages without immediate taxpayer burdens.
- Provides tailored infrastructure financing: Districts fund essential public improvements (roads, utilities, parks) not covered by city funds, making large-scale or redevelopment projects more feasible while adhering to local standards for alignment with Boulder’s goals.
- Offers city protections: The proposed ordinance and Model Service Plan would impose strict rules on services, debt, and taxation to safeguard residents and the city, building on recent state transparency reforms.
Cons:
- Adds property tax burden on residents: Owners within a district face ongoing special taxes (mill levies) to repay infrastructure debt, which could increase costs for homeowners — especially if development slows or sells out incompletely, as seen in some historical Colorado cases where taxes rose sharply.
- Creates independent entities with limited city control: Metro districts operate separately from the general fund and can incur debt/obligations independently, raising concerns about long-term accountability, even with local oversight.
- Risk of misalignment or abuse without strong regulation: Past issues in Colorado (e.g., high debt burdens in slow-selling developments) highlight potential downsides; while Boulder’s proposal emphasizes protections, critics note metro districts are “powerful” tools that require careful oversight to avoid negative impacts on residents.
- Could incentivize sprawl over infill: Enabling easier financing for new development might shift focus away from denser, in-city projects, conflicting with Boulder’s priorities for sustainable growth and preserving open space.
City Council is tentatively set to review the ordinance on April 2 (first reading) and April 16 (second reading), 2026. Residents can provide feedback on the drafts via the city’s website to help shape this tool for Boulder’s future.
